Showing posts with label space life. Show all posts
Showing posts with label space life. Show all posts

Sunday, July 4, 2021

Technosignatures


When looking for life on other planets, we do not look for little green men, or cities, or canals. Telescopes are nowhere near powerful enough to see that kind of detail. Our best satellite-based telescopes hope to see a dot, if we are lucky, if we know where and when to look.

The way we look for life is to look at the color of that dot. The precise spectrum will indicate the chemicals that are present. Certain chemicals are a sign of life: molecular oxygen, for example. Oxygen bonds really well to very many chemicals. It is unlikely to see much of it unbonded. We only have unbonded oxygen on earth because we have plants that make it. Oxygen molecules are a sure sign of life. Methane is also a likely indicator. This makes oxygen molecules a biosignature: a sign of life.

Professor Adam Frank is looking for technosignatures: a light spectrum that indicate the presence of a technology-using society. Solar panels and pollutants are two types of technosignature.

Sunday, January 31, 2016

Progress Towards Life on Mars


http://www.agenciasinc.es/en/News/Antarctic-fungi-survive-Martian-conditions-on-the-International-Space-Station

 A fungus from Antarctica has been proven to survive reasonably well in simulated Mars conditions.

This means that if we decide* to make Mars habitable, the technology to do so is at hand. We can send earth life that will survive and reproduce. If the photosynthetic species are also hardy enough, we can generate oxygen that would stabilize the atmosphere.

*That is to say, unless we have already sent it.
(June'18) Some promising cyanobacteria

Saturday, January 2, 2016

Moving to Mars?

Updated - Jan'16: Here are more details - or at least speculation - on the Musk plan, including a Mars-Earth ferrying spaceship, deep sleep for the colonists to reduce consumption during the flight and terraforming assisted by thermonuclear detonations at the poles.

If you are 5-20 years old, in 20 years, you'll be 25-40: just about the right age to start up a new life on Mars. Elon Musk, who made a fortune on Paypal has been building SpaceX, a private space exploration agency. Now he says his goal is to start a colony on mars. He says he'll charge about $500,000. More detail here.


Monday, November 17, 2014

Mankind Leaps Again

https://twitter.com/ESA_Rosetta/status/532565327721545728/photo/1In mankind's journey into the universe beyond the planet, the greatest leap was the moon walk. Not only has there been no progress that size since, there have been few feats that were equal, or even comparable. (OK, driving a car on the moon wins). Huge events, nonetheless, include Sputnik, the re-usable space vehicle, private satellite launch and robots on Mars. This week has seen another milestone for the history book: landing a robot on a comet.
It had some problems, but what's cutting edge if it doesn't occasionally bleed? Maybe for the next mission, they'll reconsider the wisdom of solar power in the far solar system.
(Update Nov18/14) They were looking for organic molecules on the surface and they found them. We'll have to wait until the sunlight gets better before we get any more detailed analysis.

Tuesday, November 11, 2014

Building a House on the Moon

Europe (ESA) has a plan:
(May'15) More on the European plan (with infographic and nerdfan discussion.) ...of course, it's a stepping stone to this:

Friday, September 12, 2014

How To Identify Life

...from a few light-years away.

http://scienceblogs.com/startswithabang/2012/06/12/sometimes-size-is-everything/
 If we are looking for life on an exoplanet, What do we look for? Well, radio signals and TV broadcasts would be sure signs, but awfully unlikely. Seeing trees or animals moving on the surface is proof but far beyond the ability of any telescope we can build or imagine building*.


Instead, we hope to analyze light from the planet. From this light we can identify the chemicals in the atmosphere using spectral analysis. Oxygen (O2) would be a good sign. It reacts so well that most atmospheres would use it all to make CO2 or H2O unless there was life to release it. Computer models now show that it is actually possible for an atmosphere to have oxygen and even ozone without ever having life. So even though oxygen is still a good sign. It is not proof. For solid proof, you would need to find oxygen, ozone, carbon dioxide, and methane with no carbon monoxide.

(Oct'15) How Space Telescopes Will Find Earth 2.0: progress in seeing an exoplanet. *

Friday, May 23, 2014

Life on Mars Confirmed!

http://galeri.uludagsozluk.com/r/marvin-the-martian-12452/
Well, life on Mars very likely, anyway...but it is probably dead by now...and we brought it.

Friday, March 1, 2013

Going to Mars Sooner?

NASA plans a manned trip to Mars in the 2030's. A private businessman wants to pull together a trip in 2018. Neither one involves landing, just orbiting.

Safety requirements in the private world are a lot lower than for NASA.
I provide the article from three sources. Compare the comments.

It is also possible that they will be visiting a much-changed Mars. An extinction-sized comet will  make a close approach to Mars in October 2014. It probably won't hit.

Tuesday, November 27, 2012

Moving to Mars?

If you are 5-20 years old, in 20 years, you'll be 25-40: just about the right age to start up a new life on Mars. Elon Musk, who made a fortune on Paypal has been building SpaceX, a private space exploration agency. Now he says his goal is to start a colony on mars. He says he'll charge about $500,000. More detail here.

Jan'16: Here are more details - or at least speculation - on the Musk plan, including a Mars-Earth ferrying spaceship, deep sleep for the colonists to reduce consumption during the flight and terraforming assisted by thermonuclear detonations at the poles.

Saturday, March 31, 2012

Looking for a Backup Earth

There has been ever more exciting news of late in looking for a a hospitable, earth-like planet. Thanks to a new orbiting telescope, the news is coming faster.

Most of the best looking planets are bigger and closer to their sun that earth. that is bad news because they will probably be too hot. If it is true that earth-like planets are normally too close to a sun, maybe we should be looking near a cooler red dwarf star to find a habitable planet.
Of course, the very idea does bring this to mind.

Plus, recent progress in how we might get there.